SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim S who wrote (23391)7/9/2006 12:36:26 PM
From: Suma  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542139
 
When it comes to the media I appreciate that there are differences in the way the news is reported. When all of the media spouts the same line we are in trouble..

That is why it is too bad when persons read or listen to only one side.. as some of the people here in Boone admittedly do.

The position that the TIMES has always taken as been
to ferret out the reality of the stories.. imo and it is a paper that I respect.

You asked what leads people to think that they support the WOT... Well, what evidence is there that they don't.. The question goes both ways.



To: Jim S who wrote (23391)7/9/2006 1:14:07 PM
From: KonKilo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542139
 
What leads people to think that the NYT's editors support the WOT? What policies have they supported that lead in that direction?

If they're at all like me, they might want a better definition than that of a struggle against a tactic.

And some objectives, milestones and a stab at a timetable.

Would you care to address any of these?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News