Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (9094)	7/10/2006 11:05:04 AM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14758

If NK is a threat to them (and it is), and NK will not listen to reason, then their argument is that a pre-emptive strike is indeed a defensive position.

To: JDN who wrote (9094)	7/10/2006 10:22:04 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14758

hindustantimes.com Japan mulls preemptive strike on N Korea missile bases Japan is considering whether a preemptive strike on North Korean missile bases would be an acceptable form of self-defence under the pacifist Japanese constitution, the government spokesman said on Monday. "If we accept that there is no other option to prevent an attack ... there is the view that attacking the launch base of the guided missiles is within the constitutional right of self-defence. ................ Wouldn't take much to buy a few "defensive" missiles from us. CHina would not like that.....