SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: thames_sider who wrote (23686)7/11/2006 5:12:33 PM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541763
 
It's the pure visceral frustration that we couldn't get our hands on the people who flew the planes into the WTC and Pentagon, and we can't get our hands on their leaders tucked away in the Pakistani tribal homelands, so beating the crap out of alleged proxies had to suffice.

Bad idea all the way around.



To: thames_sider who wrote (23686)7/11/2006 5:22:07 PM
From: KonKilo  Respond to of 541763
 
Knowing you, I'm assuming there's an ironic <g> understood there...

But yes, that might have made it understandable, and for me at least maybe even excusable. Of course, there's the logic gap that anyone dying in Abu Ghraib (or anywhere else where we have the body) most assuredly wasn't on any plane flown into the WTC... but I think logic has played small role in the rest of our Iraq misadventure, so why start now.


Thanks and thanks again for catching my sorry attempts at irony.

Of course one of the WTC 19 wouldn't be around now, but that seems to have made little difference in the way we've approached our revenge/retribution/shock&awe/whatever.