SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Green who wrote (54456)7/13/2006 11:06:42 PM
From: Cogito  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213184
 
>> Making money is certainly the most important benchmark but also taking away marketshare or sales from a competitor can certainly be considered success.

Microsoft was late to both browsers and game players but in the end became "A or THE" MAJOR force in both.<<

Don -

So if Microsoft is willing to buy market share by selling Zune for less than their cost, and they succeed in doing so, you'll consider the product a success?

Steve Jobs is accused of having a big ego. What about Gates and Ballmer? They've made Microsoft a force in both of those markets only by either giving away the product or selling it at a loss.

To what end? How does that benefit the shareholders? Isn't it just that they can't stand to see anybody succeed in a market they're not in?

- Allen



To: Don Green who wrote (54456)7/13/2006 11:28:07 PM
From: JP Sullivan  Respond to of 213184
 
How you determine success is what needs to be clarified.

Taking market share, while admirable, is not success IMHO, especially when you have to subsidize heavily. I'm only interested when MSFT makes money with the Xbox for its shareholders, not for others. Until MSFT makes money with this device, it's all pie in the sky.

-we-