Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (294981)	7/15/2006 3:50:01 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573096

..but not this way Again, what way ted?

To: tejek who wrote (294981)	7/15/2006 4:09:14 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1573096

"Israel has no right to act so unrestrained just because Lebanon can't fight back." In general, I agree. But I think this issue goes beyond Lebanon. This is between Israel and Syria, and possibly Iran. Lebanon just has the misfortune to have been Syria's cat paw in this. I personally don't think this is wise. My impression is that both Syria and Iran think that the hand of the US is pinned and without US backing, Israel can be taken. I think they are wrong in that, Israel has a history of being able to defend against bigger forces than Iran or Syria can throw at them.