Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (192118)	7/19/2006 11:15:51 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Tell every who questions you that da Rat says you are some shade of green. Err.. thanks.. I think.. ;0) I'm a pragmatist WR.. If we can produce alternative fuels, especially fuels that can be used in our current fleet of vehicles, more efficiently than buying it from monopolist, and often tyrannical, foreign suppliers, I'M ALL FOR IT. It's an issue of NATIONAL SECURITY. And it's an added plus if we can create a closed cycle CO2 emissions process where we're not releasing increasing amount of the gas by burning fossil fuels, where that gas has been sequestered for millions of years. As for ADM and CAR.. the markets will dictate. If corn prices increase to the point where it impacts profitability of ethanol and biodiesels based upon that feedstock, the markets will find a cheaper and more efficient means of producing it. And nothing in their lobbying efforts will be able to stop it, IMO. Hawk