SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Land Shark who wrote (65919)7/20/2006 3:12:16 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
So did Saudi Arabia.

Wrong.



To: Land Shark who wrote (65919)7/20/2006 3:21:02 PM
From: atm_prophet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
War Criminal ... LOL ... isn't every war criminal in your book?



To: Land Shark who wrote (65919)7/20/2006 4:00:07 PM
From: one_less  Respond to of 93284
 
War Criminal? I have always had a problem with that term.

It reminds me of years ago when I saw the town bully finally get whipped, not by a bigger bully but by a smaller kid. All his buddies started spreading the rumor that the victor won only because he ‘fought dirty’. Eventually they ganged up on him to teach him a ‘lesson.’

It also reminds me that while we have been sleeping, many things lacking a ring tone of right or wrong have crept into the law. Special interests, more than principle, are the currency of this pirated realm.



To: Land Shark who wrote (65919)7/20/2006 4:51:50 PM
From: American Spirit  Respond to of 93284
 
Yeah don't use "war criminal". That's playing into Bushie hands. It's too extreme. Especially since we all agree Saddam was at least a creep and thuggish menace.

Bush is a corrupt man who lied and misled us into a war he planned so poorly that it quickly became a self-defeating quagmire.

"Misleader" is therefore the most accurate term to define Bush, not "war criminal". All wars have some degree of "criminality" to them.