Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dijaexyahoo who wrote (22455)	7/23/2006 8:37:08 PM
From: Honey_Bee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

Dija...Bob Brinker was NOT rated number one in any category for any length of time. Why do you keep ignoring that fact? Or are you accusing Kirk and me of lying about something that is easily verifiable? Why don't you take a trip to your local library and find out for yourself and then kindly shut your trap--no offense. :) BTW: I agree that most of Bob Brinker's lies are not "easily substantiated." No doubt many who listened to that caller who asked about the QQQQs from "5 years ago," and heard Bob Brinker's NON-SEQUITUR (to quote math junkie) answer, have no clue that he was lying by omission, spin and subterfuge. You seem to miss the whole point about how Bob Brinker operates nowadays. How many lies do you have to be made aware of before the scales peel off of your eyes?

To: dijaexyahoo who wrote (22455)	7/23/2006 9:19:29 PM
From: stockalot	Respond to of 42834

"If Hulbert, in his March newsletter, said brinker was #1 through Jan. 2006, then that means to me (and anyone who is objective) that brinker is #1 until such time as Hulbert releases new results for that category." Where did that come from Dija? Is it your claim that in the March newsletter Hulbert said Brinker was # 1 through Jan 2006 and then stopped listing it? That's bizzare. Can you quote the source for that?

To: dijaexyahoo who wrote (22455)	7/23/2006 10:06:45 PM
From: stockalot	Respond to of 42834

While trying his darndest to alibi for Brinker's claims of being the current # 1 rated stock market timer by Hulbert and his dissembling claims on his site, Dija acted as though Brinker was incapable of blatant lying and asked. "--Please name one "real whopper" that you have "caught" him in?" And so I gave him a most flagrant example of him trying to fraudulently claim that he had hit a home run in recommending a stock and was like "printing money" --problem was he had recommended the stock on the same program a few months before at twice the level it was on his second bite of the apple and it was still underwater when he was bragging on himself from the first recommendation. He was so dishonest that he tried to cast aspersions on the honesty and intelligence of those who caught him in the lie. Now Dija admitted the lie, but set up another straw man saying: "--OK. Thank you. You have successfully found a fib brinker told when he thought he was anonymous. Now, can you tell us an out-and-out lie he has told in the newsletter or on the radio program, when everyone knew it was him writing or speaking? If you can't, then it becomes "obvious" that he did not lie when he stated in the July newsletter that Marketimer was rated #1 for long-term stock market timing." I quickly gave you three examples of pure D LIES that Brinker told when everybody knew it was him speaking and asked you if you wanted more. So having been shown Brinker to lie on several occasions at Dija's request, Dija goes back on the alibi trail with the following hubris. "stockalot said: <<He told the caller. "We had to stop the newsletter from going to libraries because we have "electronic enhancements" -and it would not be fair to those libraries not to have the electronic enhancements.">> --OK. I will accept that, and the one about closing his message boards, as lies. I heard both calls, and thought at the time that he was lying. It's a real stretch to think he wasn't. Unfortunately, they are lies that are not easily substantiated. Therefore, I still believe his claim that his Marketimer was rated #1 by Hulbert for long term stock market timing. I just do not believe he is stupid enough to lie about something that is so easy to verify." So Dija first acts like Brinker doesn't lie. I give him a whopper from his generally accepted alias and Dija admits that but asks for a second hoop, that being an example of Brinker lying when people knew it was Brinker doing the talking. I quickly gave him several. Each time he acts as though it is a very difficult assignment and I give him chapter and verse of outright lies in moments. Now Dija goes off on another tangent seemingly admitting that though a proven inveterate liar, he doesn't believe Brinker would lie about his performance. LOL