Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: peanut_butter who wrote (22503)	7/24/2006 11:29:24 PM
From: Honey_Bee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

I have one remaining post so will take advantage of it. Of course, you are aware that your new allotment for tomorrow begins in 40 minutes. You tell me that you have "said many times that it was a sorry mistake on Brinker's part." Where exactly did you say this "many times." I certainly don't remember you saying it even one time since you started posting here as peanut butter--perhaps I missed these "many times" and you can point me to just one time. Of course it's my opinion that you didn't ruin your retirement when Bob Brinker made his biggest blunders by calling for several "counter-trend rallies" in the Nasdaq 100 Index. I notice that you didn't say my opinion was wrong. And finally, about retirees' using their heads when following Bob Brinker, I agree. And the best way to do that is keep their $185+ in their own pockets and out of Brinker's. .

To: peanut_butter who wrote (22503)	7/25/2006 1:52:05 AM
From: stockalot	Respond to of 42834

Butter guy says: "How could you say I've "ignored" it. I have said many times that it was a sorry mistake on Brinker's part, bad call, badly handled, I think people have said. I agree. Yes, Brinker sent out the bulletin, that would indicate that he believed and expected that some people would follow the advice. I think the way he put it was "those interested". I don't believe any goon squads were sent out to enforce it as an act of law. I think he expected and believed that people should follow the guidelines. Sounds like he might have been mistaken about that too. And I don't think for a minute who did or didn't "take the 2000_QQQ buy recommendation" is "irrelevant." But I think what's more relevant is who followed the guidelines and who overextended themselves and misjudged their own tolerance levels, as Prescott apparently did." Yes, thanks for admitting the obvious. Indeed you seem to have said many of these same things under names like Queen and shew and butter and a host of others. What is the point with all the aliases?

To: peanut_butter who wrote (22503)	7/25/2006 1:52:06 AM
From: stockalot	Respond to of 42834

Butter guy says: "How could you say I've "ignored" it. I have said many times that it was a sorry mistake on Brinker's part, bad call, badly handled, I think people have said. I agree. Yes, Brinker sent out the bulletin, that would indicate that he believed and expected that some people would follow the advice. I think the way he put it was "those interested". I don't believe any goon squads were sent out to enforce it as an act of law. I think he expected and believed that people should follow the guidelines. Sounds like he might have been mistaken about that too. And I don't think for a minute who did or didn't "take the 2000_QQQ buy recommendation" is "irrelevant." But I think what's more relevant is who followed the guidelines and who overextended themselves and misjudged their own tolerance levels, as Prescott apparently did." Yes, thanks for admitting the obvious. Indeed you seem to have said many of these same things under names like Queen and shew and butter and a host of others. What is the point with all the aliases?