To: Honey_Bee who wrote (22508 ) 7/25/2006 3:34:43 PM From: peanut_butter Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42834 Honey, to respond to your message 22508: It's too dull and trivial to spend much time on but since I have 5 posts I'll use one.You tell me that you have "said many times that it was a sorry mistake on Brinker's part." Where exactly did you say this "many times." I certainly don't remember you saying it even one time since you started posting here as peanut butter--perhaps I missed these "many times" and you can point me to just one time. I posted on Yahoo as peanut_butter_luvr until the faint-hearted hide-behind-others-IDs copycat imp added an "e" as a final letter to my ID and used it for himself. After that I didn't post much. And I'm not going to get into an extended "alias" dispute with you or cheat/stockalot, rail as you will. I thought this board wasn't supposed to be about personal attacks on other posters.Of course it's my opinion that you didn't ruin your retirement when Bob Brinker made his biggest blunders by calling for several "counter-trend rallies" in the Nasdaq 100 Index. I notice that you didn't say my opinion was wrong. I didn't say you were right or wrong, what difference does it make? But no, I didn't ruin my retirement either financially or psychologically. First, I'm not retired, and second, I lost a little money because I was cautious and made my own decisions, but I'm not going to spend even one year agonizing and blaming, let alone six. And finally, about retirees' using their heads when following Bob Brinker, I agree. And the best way to do that is keep their $185+ in their own pockets and out of Brinker's. That's your opinion honey and it's little other than personal bias, but why don't we just leave that up to them?