Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: peanut_butter who wrote (22556)	7/26/2006 10:15:42 AM
From: Honey_Bee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

I've been threatened by more effective Brinker defenders than you--take your best shot.

To: peanut_butter who wrote (22556)	7/26/2006 10:40:47 AM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 42834

Are you trying to cause trouble? Honey and I have been posting here for a long time while you have been here but 5 days and already you are fighting with regulars. We could go weeks here without anyone posting at all, since there is little new to say about Brinker. Then all of a sudden a handful of new names mysteriously showed up here at the same time as if they suddenly "discovered" Silicon Investor. Some were quite hostile to us both and I see at least one has been banished. Both Honey and I have been posting links to Silicon Investor from our forums and BLOGS at Suite101 for years so anyone who reads any of our work was well aware of Silicon Investor. Here is a link from Suite101 to SI from April 2004 suite101.com So you folks who suddenly showed up here are here for a reason other than sharing new information about Brinker. If you wanted to do that, you'd have come here long ago. Have you been banished from Yahoo! or is your IP address known at Suite101 so you can't fool us with multiple IDs? Is this the last place we post at where you have not been discovered as multiple aliases or serial harassers? If I seem paranoid, it is for good reason. As I stated, we've been posting here for years and there would not be weeks and weeks on no discussion here if I wanted to use this forum to "promote myself" so you are going to need a better excuse to keep up the harassment to keep the topic off Brinker. Kirk out

To: peanut_butter who wrote (22556)	5/25/2007 5:46:03 PM
From: stockalot	Respond to of 42834

Queenie, are you sure you don't admit to making this post. In addition to a tell, you have to admit it is humorous when this screen name was whining for "proof" of posting under multiple screen names--a couple days before being banished along with you for posting under multiple screen names. That "you can't prove".. seems to be the last refuge of a fibber to me. "To: honeytres who wrote (22547) 7/25/2006 11:27:56 PM From: peanut_butter 4 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 31345 Honeytres said Oh my, peanut butter, I sure have no desire to get into an "alias dispute" with you. Then why continue on with it as you are doing? I am willing to accept that you are the same person who posts at UTEK. I'd just like to know how you managed to get so many different aliases over here. I haven't figured out how to get two yet. ROFLOL! Why do you go on making empty charges you can't possibly support? I don't believe it's possible for one user to have "so many different aliases over here". Please give us some kind of proof of the "many different aliases" you accuse me of, or control yourself, else someone may think you are attacking another poster just for the sake of attacking and harassing. Is it possible that you believe that because you have been here longer, the TOU don't apply to you? " Do you deny being the same person that typed this one Queen?