Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (10396)	7/27/2006 12:35:01 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

I am not sure if you as an individual said that they would use WMDs regardless of the consequences. But that is beside the point. The fact of the matter is that it is the constant refrain from you neocon warmongers as a group. As for what advantages would accrue to Hezbollah or Syria or Iran or whoever else by using WMDs, what makes you think they should care about any advantages? Whatever happened to the neonuts' theory that those "fanatics" would use WMDs as soon as they get them? And yes, if they had WMDs, why don't they even threaten to use them, even as their land is getting carpet-bombed by Israel? As for nukes, I bet that it will be the US that will use the nuke first. Of course, it will have a nice name - tactical nuke, or low-yield nuke, or mini nuke, or bunker-busting nuke etc. But regardless of the name, it will end up killing tens if not hundreds of thousands of people.