Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Math Junkie who wrote (22745)	7/29/2006 9:41:26 PM
From: stockalot	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 42834

Now wait just a minute Math. It is not just "my idea" that Queen was posting as Peanut_butter on SI and as barbobbot among many others on Yahoo. It was obvious and still is. Notice sHE didn't dispute it for a minute, after the initial silliness about someone else being peanut_butter in "another department" of her "business". She kept trying to change the subject to "another" Butter. :) Do you still not believe Queen was posting as peanut_butter here just as I said and you argued the point? I cannot believe you don't have proof beyond doubt.

To: Math Junkie who wrote (22745)	7/30/2006 12:00:22 AM
From: queenleah	Respond to of 42834

"The same person, or at least evidence strongly suggests, loved to construct fantasy personas on Suite101 to lie about his success following Brinker." I haven't been to 101 in years. More empty harassment. All the evidence I've seen in Queen's case consists of the fact that Stockalot's beliefs about her are consistent with his beliefs about her, i.e., an elaborate, self-consistent theory. Yep. Consistent in his own fantasy but that's all. None of the parts of the theory that matter are verifiable, and I think it's wrong to expect people to reveal enough personal information about themselves on the Net to disprove such theories. I do too.