Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Math Junkie who wrote (22780)	7/30/2006 3:26:07 PM
From: mrcajones	Respond to of 42834

Well well well. What have we here? The same old bunch going on about the same old thing. I don't mean you math. I take it UTEK moved over here. Maybe UTEK would be a good place to post now. Now that all you mudslinging posters have vanished, I'll have to go over there and find out for myself. Carry on. :) Well I see pig came out of his coma. Maybe just coming back from some mountain top, who knows. Cheatalot, still going on his rampages. What else is new?

To: Math Junkie who wrote (22780)	7/30/2006 5:55:23 PM
From: stockalot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Math, don't attack me simply because you are caught up in providing an alibi for Queen and claiming she was not posting under multiple aliases as peanut_butter and Queen. Since you seem to be impuning my take rather than looking at the facts honestly I will respond. It was a lead pipe cinch that Queen was the Queen of multiple alias posting at Yahoo. Often with only her typing late at night there would often tons of recc given to a nonsensical post. She was caught two or three times posting under a different screen name while piling up the recs. Yahoo does not care obviously how many screen names one uses. She used many to stalk the thread and discredit under many names what was said about Brinker.. But you and Queen and others denied the game being played. SI indeed found that Queen was violating their multiple alias posting provisions and took action. If you will look, you will see that the Queen90700 and peanut_butter aliases were banished at the same time. At every turn it became more and more obvious that Queen was CAUGHT. She has claimed that sHE only posts from one computer and the other one doesn't work. She never claimed until after she was caught to be posting at a "business" or in a "department". Indeed she has claimed to be living on a family farm and while claiming a lot of acerage, I know of no farms of that modest a size that have offices and departments with multiple computers. But in the letter she publicized to the site administrator she claimed to be in a business where there were "departments" and acted as though she just found out that there was another person who joined SI. Now of course she did not initially admit that the "other person" she claimed to exist was posting as peanut_butter and came here within hours of her arrival under Queen. Posted only on this thread. Posted nearly identical hubris. Used the same very rare acronym that only Queen had used in the entire history of posting on this site and on Yahoo. Queen said she had no connection with this other person. Now you seem to claim there is a "Mrs. Columbo" out there. A family member of queen who collaborates with her and posts on the same Isp and obviously shares the same goal to promote Brinker propaganda and stalk his critics pretending to be huge in number. Queen never has said that she knew this peanut_butter was posting from "another department in the business". She seemed to indicate it was a shocking discovery. Yet under the alias peanut_butter we learned that "they" were using "peanut_butter_luvr" on Yahoo. And when throwing a fit, your Queen threw out that name with the perfect underlinings though as far as I know it hasn't been used in a long while and was not a long used name on Yahoo. So why hasn't Queen claimed it was a spouse or a crazy aunt in the attic who snuck down to the office complex and started posting on SI Brinker thread the same day she did causing Queen to get caught and both of them banished, if you now claim it was a family member, Math? Now you can wag all you want, but its' obvious the more of the story that came out, the simple explanation is best. Queen thought SI wouldn't or couldn't catch her posting under multiple screen names. She took a shot. It worked for several days. She was caught. Both names were banished. You have a lot of emotion invested in vouching for her honesty over many months. You dislike anything I say that is correct whether it's about Brinker or one of his shills. In this instance I was correct and clicking on t he screen names involved prove it. Why not just let it go and realize that you were lied to. It happens with those Brinker zealots a lot. One person, one screen name at a time is the policy here at SI. It seems that you and Queen and many others are in a snit because that is the way it is. I think it is absolutely the right thing to do. And as you can see from the decline in recs that were esculating when Queen was allowed to use multiple aliases, SI levels the playing field.