Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: queenleah who wrote (22941)	8/2/2006 8:02:08 PM
From: EQ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

*I also feel sorry for people who have not developed a backbone enough to take SOME responsibility for their own actions.* Well Queen Leah, I think we can all agree that Bob takes NO responsibility for the QQQQ Disaster. So, it is good to know that YOU feel sorry for him.

To: queenleah who wrote (22941)	8/2/2006 8:35:37 PM
From: Honey_Bee	Respond to of 42834

Queen, whether or not an individual lost money and/or went against Bob Brinker and took responsibility for themselves at any given time before losing the 70-80% of their money in QQQQs has ZERO impact on what Bob Brinker did or did not do and certainly does not relieve him of responsibility. Why are you unable to understand that? Or perhaps I should ask, why do you pretend not to understand that? And Queen, are you aware that Bob Brinker ENTHUSIASTICALLY touted his QQQQ countertrend rally trades to his subscribers month after month after month after month in the Marketimer--lowering his "buy price" as the Nasdaq dropped month after month after month??? I didn't think so...

To: queenleah who wrote (22941)	8/3/2006 12:39:17 AM
From: stockalot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Spoken like a true Brinker syncophant that has used multiple aliases to pump the guy. "I can't speak for dija, but what some of strongly believe is-- first of all, if they "listened to his 'sage' [mistaken] QQQ advice on the buy side", they should have listened carefully not only to the guidelines given, but to their own heads as to what kind of investor they were, and to their guts as to what kind of risk they were willing and able to tolerate. If they did, they didn't lose as huge a percentage of their portfolios as some would like to pretend. And no, they weren't supposed to suddenly "turn into their own gurus"--they were supposed to have been using their own heads all along, including how deeply to get in and when to get OUT, with or without advice. If you don't have the brain or the backbone to do that, with or without advice, then don't be IN in the first place." There you go. Brinker is a genius but you should be smarter than he is and not listen to bad advice. Only listen and heed his good advice. If he gives bad advice, you are your own financial advisor. But he is a genius and a voice in the wilderness... but if he screws up you should know much more than the genius and not blame him. ONLY TAKE BRINKERS GOOD ADVICE AND NEVER TAKE BRINKER'S BAD ADVICE AND HELP QUEEN AND HER MULTIPLE ALIASES ON MULTIPLE SITES SPREAD THE WORD OF WHAT A GREAT MARKETIMER BOB BRINKER IS. Did I get that about right ???

To: queenleah who wrote (22941)	12/15/2006 10:13:22 AM
From: Yogizuna	Respond to of 42834

>>> And no, they weren't supposed to suddenly "turn into their own gurus"--they were supposed to have been using their own heads all along, including how deeply to get in and when to get OUT, with or without advice. If you don't have the brain or the backbone to do that, with or without advice, then don't be IN in the first place. <<< If they have the "brains and backbone" to get along with or without advice, they would have not needed Brinker! One subscribes to someone like Brinker to be led along, not have their own brain. LOL