Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Katelew who wrote (195427)	8/6/2006 11:12:35 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

For one, Israel can stop trying to get UN/Lebanon/Nato force to take over the fight for them. Basically with the proposed UN resolution, Israel is trying to get someone else to do the fighting while reserving the right to step back in with their military force if the peacekeepers can't do the job. That's fine with Israel. Just so long as the discussion remains, "Who will do the job?" instead of "Nobody do the job! Everybody stop shooting right now!", Israel is okay. What they are not okay with is the idea that they should go back to the status quo ante, where Hizbullah ran all non-supporters out of South Lebanon, and launched rockets at Israel from inside UN bases with impunity.