Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (195430)	8/7/2006 8:43:01 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Are you trying to tell us that a violent and illegally armed militia in the US, being armed by a foreign power, with nuclear and biological weapons (and the missiles to deliver them) wouldn't intimidate the US government, or at least local authorities? Who has nuclear weapons? Besides, Bush gave up looking for and accounting for Iraq's WMD. Bush doesn't care why should you? If you can't see the difference in the threat this time around, and Israel's reaction to that threat, you're more of a fool than you've already shown yourself to be. Hezbollah is larger, better trained, and better armed than the last time Hezbollah got Israel out of Lebanon. Israel knows that and would love to pass the problem off to the UN rather than sit in Lebanon for 20 years. I understand quite well why Israel reacted to Jul 12 the way they did. It was a mistake, but I understand why they did it. But now that they've done it they're in it. In for a penny, in for a pound. Perhaps the best thing out of this mess is that the US is getting a glimmer or what it's in store for if they invade Iran or Syria. Oh yeah, and your father wears a burka. jttmab