Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (195497)	8/7/2006 9:01:52 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Who has nuclear weapons? Besides, Bush gave up looking for and accounting for Iraq's WMD. Bush doesn't care why should you? So you would consider it perfectly fine were Farrakhan's Nation of Islam, or the KKK armed by one of the nuclear powers, Pakistan, France, Britain, China, Russia, or India with WMDs that were of greater quantity than that held by the US and financed with billions of dollars in order to perpetuate a war against Jews in the US and Canada??? That wouldn't count as "intimidation" of the American government?? Because that's the analogy, ridiculous as you may think it sounds... Hizbullah is BETTER ARMED, BETTER TRAINED, and BETTER MOTIVATED than the Lebanese Army!! And they so INTIMIDATED the government of Lebanon that they refused to deploy their army along the border of Lebanon for over 6 years!! But you just can't understand that, or more appropriately, are DELIBERATELY AVOIDING acknowleging that fact!! Oh yeah, and your father wears a burka. Elif air ab tizak! Hawk