Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (196155)	8/8/2006 5:08:51 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Are any of those approaches prohibited under the language of "all necessary means", or "severe consequences"?? You missed the point again. Well, pound THIS POINT in your @ss!!! The intelligence services of 15 UNSC members COULD NOT VERIFY THAT SADDAM WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH HIS CEASEFIRE AND DISARMAMENTS OBLIGATIONS!!! That's why they had NO CHOICE but to vote UNANIMOUSLY to declare Saddam(Iraq) in Material Breach of that ceasefire. His responsibility was to ENSURE that the UNSC was SATISFIED that he had disarmed as instructed AND WAS NO LONGER A THREAT TO PEACE AND REGIONAL STABILITY!!! It was NOT JUST ABOUT WMDS!! IT WAS ABOUT SADDAM NOT DESTABILIZING THE REGION WITH HIS AMBITIONS AND ACTIVITIES!! And I've shown you clear and convincing EVIDENCE taken RIGHT FROM SADDAM'S OWN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE FILES, that he was continuing to support terrorism and TARGET AMERICANS AND AMERICAN INTERESTS!! Not put that in your pipe and smoke it. And while you're at it, pack sand!! Hawk