Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (23607)	8/14/2006 2:37:07 PM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Score: "Bob Brinker's Posse" - 1 (on a penalty kick) "Bob Brinker's Critics" - 3 "Fake-Fahrenheit" Message 22717896 "Pigface" Message 22718059 "Stocky" Message 22717788 "fake dija" Message 22717047 (but what do you expect from someone who wanted a username of pigsh*t and had to settle for pigstuff?) "Bob Brinker's Posse" has reverted to name calling and they'll probably blame the pig!

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (23607)	8/14/2006 2:56:05 PM
From: Math Junkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Honey, it's interesting that you put "model portfolio cash reserves" in quotation marks when you paraphrased his QQQ advice. That phrase does not appear as you quoted it in Marketimer or the bulletin in relation to the QQQ call. And you accuse me of lying? It's also interesting that you quoted selected passages from Marketimer issues, including November 2000, while omitting the very clear statement from that same issue that "Since this represents a short-term opportunity, and is not part of our long-term investment approach, we will not include this recommendation in our long-term model portfolios on page eight." (Nov 2000 issue, page 2, paragraph 4.) We agree that Brinker's advertising is inexcusable because it omits a major failed call, but trying to say that black is white or that truth is falsehood is NOT the way to make that point if you want your criticisms of Brinker to have any credibility in the eyes of your readers.