Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (13374)	8/14/2006 6:12:30 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

It can't be that hard to fly a plane Tigerpaw I'd like to see you fly a huge jet into anything at all besides the ground. It's not easy at all to fly a jet into a building, and on the FIRST PASS BOTH TIMES. And just about dead center too. It was too good really to believe any amateur pilot could do that.

To: TigerPaw who wrote (13374)	8/14/2006 6:43:25 PM
From: Rock_nj	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

I don't have a big problem with the WTC-1 and 2 towers coming down from fires. Sure, there are questions regarding that scenario as well, such as the melting point of steel and how much of the fuel would have simply burned off in the initial explosion. But, given that they were hit by planes and burning badly fire is a potential candidate for their collapse. However, there is absolutely no logical explanation for how and why WTC-7 actually collapsed, what caused the collapes of that steel framed building. Funny how there is so little interest in determining the cause of the WTC-7 building failure considering it is the first and only steel framed building to ever collapse due to apprently fire, and the fires were not that big anyway. Also, odd how this building housed the CIA, DEA and SEC amongst other government offices. The whole lack of official interest in this unprecedented building failure is reason enough to be skeptical of the U.S. government. Exactly the same skepticism as I feel about the Pentagon being hit by a plane that travelled towards it without any resistance at all for over an hour, all the way from Ohio. OK, perhaps there's some logical explanation for how this can actually happen, but nobody in government seems the least bit interested in getting to the bottom of this other unprecedented event and how and why it happened. It all smells terrible, lot's of conspiracy smoke, most likely some fire behind all that smoke. Why were there no arab names on ANY of the passenger manifests from the 4 9/11/01 planes? Is that not odd? Not many people appear to think so, despite the fact that these attacks were suppossedly carried out by guys with names like Muhhamad. There are so many inconsistencies regarding 9/11/01 that you have to question the "official" version. It's simply full of holes.