Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (197404)	8/15/2006 9:35:41 AM
From: SARMAN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Let’s compare the two forces shall we? Since you are so dense that it is beyond you comprehension. Tanks: Israel YES, Hezbo NO fighter planes: YES, NO Precision missiles: YES, NO $2 billion/yr budget: YES, NO Soldiers: 500k including reserves, 5k Helicopters: YES, NO Laser guided missiles: YES, NO Submarines: YES, NO Warships: YES, NO Catucha: NO, YES Soldiers will to die for the cause: NO, YES So you see NADINE, the odds are stacked to the IDF favor. Can you find a way around that argument? So definitely Israel lost by not achieving it objectives. And the objectives were, 2 kidnapped soldiers, disarming Hezbo, breaking Hezbo and controlling the lands to the Litany. The soldiers were forgotten, Hezo is still armed, Hezbo is stronger than ever and the Israel controls empty pocket at the Litany. If this is victory for Israel, the US should divert the $$ from Israel to Hezbo and make them the ME supper power cause Israel proved that it is not worth the American taxpayers $$.