SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jttmab who wrote (197407)8/14/2006 9:26:21 PM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
The biggest barrage of Hezbollah rockets came down on the last day before the cease fire. What is Nadine talking about? I think Nadine is delusional and nothing else.



To: jttmab who wrote (197407)8/14/2006 9:28:14 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
Sorry about that, but it was predictable. There was no way that the IDF was going to destroy Hezbollah. Israel created Hezbollah to begin with; an unintended consequence of the occupation of Lebanon

Israel may have created a fertile ground for Hezbullah, but it is a crop carefully tended by Iran. Iran trained, Iran equipped to the tune of $250 million a year they say - that's a LOT of moolah for a relatively small force. They even sent Iranian officers to fight with them.

To just say "Israel created them" is a weird statement, in fact. But I've often noticed that people on the left side of the fence talk as if ONLY the US and Israel could ever actually DO anything, as if Iran and Syria and Al Qaeda didn't make their own decisions too.

As for "destroying" Hezbullah so that it had no support, no. But if they had executed a blitzkrieg succesfully, Nasrallah would be dead along with most of his officers, and most of the military fortifications and rockets would definitely be destroyed. They could have done that. They did some part of that, I don't know how much.