Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SARMAN who wrote (197676)	8/16/2006 1:43:46 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I wont argue with this post. I knew for awhile you had a good heart. But you do know what is meant by routing out al queda, hiz,ham,iJ, and the rest--it involves force. So hiz attacks Iz on undisputed Iz territory and kills 8, kidnaps 2 and launches katushas at israeli targets in the north. Now one can argue that Iz overreacted but one cannot argue that a response was not called for. So its both Sarman. Yes by all means lets change the cycle of hstred on the ground, but how best to stop the provocations. Unfortunately the language of the terrorists, besides all the social stuff they do is violence and force. A nation must have the right of self defense and whether one thinks israel overreacted in the beginning or not, any reaction would have likely escalated to that point anyway. Its is a conundrum Sarman and i suspect neither of us really has an answer. We just gotta keep on trying to get reasonable folks to the table.