Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Howe who wrote (13717)	8/18/2006 6:21:48 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

remember these guys said Bush was gonna cancel the 2004 elections and declare Martial Law.

To: David Howe who wrote (13717)	8/18/2006 7:00:07 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

More power to force us into accepting a police state, or have you missed the slide towards a police state since Bush was elected the first time. Don't you know the Bush family did business with the Nazi's until ordered by US courts to cease their business activities with the Nazi's in 1942!!

To: David Howe who wrote (13717)	8/18/2006 9:28:24 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

They planned 9/11 so that they could have all that and still loose power in Nov. 2008 when Bush's last term ran out. To what end? This makes no sense. Does Hitler make sense? Does Saddam make sense? Does Operation Northwoods makes sense? Does 9-11 make sense? None of these make sense. What doesn't make sense to me is: Bush says they had no idea that terrorists would be attacking with hijacked planes. But did you know that on 9-11 the military was running a drill for hijacked airplanes being used as weapons? That doesn't make sense does it? The fact that they were running drills for exactly what happened on 9-11 is truly eerie.

To: David Howe who wrote (13717)	8/18/2006 10:49:00 PM
From: Doug R	Respond to of 20039

"...to do what, fight terrorism?" No...to increase their power...period. Increase their control...period. When you're deliberately dense in asking a question like that, David, it's really obvious. You should be more honest. The illegal invasion of Iraq..."shock and awe". 9/11 was shock and awe...otherwise known as terrorism. When you kneejerk defend (however obtusely) the current administration, you're supporting terrorists. The current administration used terrorism against our own country on 9/11 to expand their power and control. "free speech zones" = police state. Arresting people for the t-shirts they wear = police state. Warrantless wiretapping = police state. Secret prisons = police state. Secret detentions = police state. Secret renditions of suspects to torturing countries = police state. "Disappearing" suspects = police state. Hackable voting machines manufactured by politically biased companies = police state. Rumsfeld: "You better watch what you say, watch what you do" = police state. No knock entry = police state.