SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sioux Nation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (77128)8/19/2006 12:35:14 PM
From: SiouxPal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362295
 
In about 80 days we'll either be in bliss or suicidal.



To: American Spirit who wrote (77128)8/19/2006 12:52:17 PM
From: SiouxPal  Respond to of 362295
 
Jim Webb: Hero, Leader, Straight Talk Patriot, Senator
Brent Budowsky


08.18.2006

A bold prediction: Jim Webb will be elected United States Senator from Virginia in the election shocker of 2006.

A brief word about George Allen. I had never heard the word Macaca until it came out of the mouth of the incumbent Senator from Virginia. And I am even willing to give him the benefit of the doubt that he didn't exactly say it, or
didn't mean it, or didn't know exactly what he meant by it. Whatever.

Senator Allen said something that was far, far worse than that. He pointed to an American of Indian descent, and said: welcome to America. This is the kind of tactic that has no place in America, the idea of demeaning and ridiculing the Americanism of a fellow American, whether the color of his skin is the same as mine, or different.

Jim Webb has been at war with bands of brothers and sisters of all races, colors, creeds, backgrounds and descents and this kind of politics would never occur to him. His America is our America, the real America, and the true America, which is a large house with many rooms, a large family with many members, from diverse backgrounds, all worthy of respect and honor.

Jim Webb's Virginia is the Virginia of Mark Warner, who governed with integrity and competence, who showed respect for political supporters and opponents alike, and who won huge victories by bringing many of the best people into government, and bringing out the best in people.

Jim Webb will enter the Senate with some of the most awesome qualifications of any new Senator ever elected, and will be a major national figure from his very first day.

He was an authentic hero in war: interested parties should read the book The Song of the Nightingale which chronicles Webb along with John McCain and other peers.

Jim Webb has been a major author of brilliant works that tell the stories of war. And trust me, in an age when national security is the front burner issue:

If I were surrounded by terrorists with guns and missiles aimed at my head, I would be rather be alone with one Jim Webb than twenty George Allens or a hundred Dick Cheneys.

If I were asked who should make the decisions about war and peace, I would rather it be someone who has been there, done that, in combat and as Secretary of the Navy rather than those who view war as political weapons, dinner party fun, or big talk at neocon seminars.

The Senate could have used Jim Webb's voice, experience and judgment in 2002 when he was warning about the perils of an Iraq War. The country could have used Jim Webb's fierce devotion to our troops and military families for all these years when too few fought the fight in the Congress for armor, bandages, helmets and health care for our vets and troops.

George Allen is certainly not the best that our national democracy has to offer, and sadly, in truth, he is not the worst either as reprehensible as his recent comments were. But Jim Webb is the best of America, courage, honor, straight talk, judgment, experience, and integrity.

Jim Webb possesses that gift that is so rare in our democracy today: the willingness and the daring to challenge our people to be better and braver, and to reject those who pander to fear, division, and smallness.

George Allen may sneer at someone with the words "welcome to America." The voters will make a statement to that kind of politics that says: welcome to the modern Virginia, and to the fighting Marine who talks straight, welcome to the United States Senate.

huffingtonpost.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (77128)8/19/2006 3:28:21 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362295
 
Message 22735424



To: American Spirit who wrote (77128)8/21/2006 2:37:37 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 362295
 
Serial Criminal Bush Busted Again
______________________________________________________________

By Dave Lindorff

August 19, 2006

opednews.com

For the second time in two months, a federal court has ruled that the president is in violation of the Constitution. This time it's a federal court in Detroit that has ruled that President Bush has violated the Fourth Amendment against illegal search and seizure for his order to the National Security Agency to monitor the phone and Internet messages of Americans without bothering to obtain a court order based upon probable cause.

The first time, it was the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled in late June that the president had violated the Constitution by asserting he had the power to ignore the Third Geneva Convention on Treatment of Prisoners of War-a treaty formally signed into law by the U.S. and made an integral part of the U.S. Criminal Code.

The important thing about these two rulings--and it is a point that the squeamish mainstream media have shied away from mentioning--is that they both are declaring the president to be a criminal. That is, he has been found in the first case to be in criminal violation of the Constitution, as well as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and in the second, he has been found to be in violation of U.S. and International Law.

Note that when someone has committed a felony--say a bank robbery or a case of assault and battery or of murder--and when a court has found that person to be guilty of the crime in question, that person is from that moment hence considered a criminal. The case may be appealed to a higher court, but in the meantime, judgment has been rendered, and a penalty assigned.

In Bush's case, the highest court in the land has reached its verdict in the War Crimes case involving Bush's claim that as Commander in Chief he had the power to ignore both law and Constitution and declare captives in the so-called war on terror and in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to be excluded from the protections of the Geneva convention. The justices, by a margin of 5-3, declared that his claim was bogus. He has no power to ignore the Constitution, whether in wartime or peacetime. The clear result of that ruling is that the president is a war criminal.

The latest federal court decision, in a case brought by the ACLU, has reached the same conclusion, and on the same grounds. The president has been claiming that as commander in chief, he has the right to ignore both the FISA law passed by Congress and signed into law by President Jimmy Carter, and the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. And a federal judge has again found that his claim is bogus. The president, the judge has declared, is bound by the Constitution to follow the letter of the law, and has criminally failed to do so.

Now there has been no penalty established in either of these crimes, serious as they are, because under the Constitution, the president cannot be convicted or punished by a court unless he is first impeached and removed from office, but the facts of his serial criminal behavior has been established.

It is important to point out, as Barbara Olshansky and I have done in our book The Case for Impeachment, that impeachment is not, primarily, about actual criminal acts by a president. The Founders, when they included impeachment as a remedy for removing elected officials, including the president, from office, were clear that they were primarily concerned about political crimes, which may or may not be literally against the law. Such crimes, it is clear, referred to actions that threatened the political system--for example abuse of power, or lying to Congress or to the American people. At the same time, it is also clear that the Founders saw impeachment as an appropriate measure when a president actually breaks the law, if the violation is so serious as to threaten the political system or the welfare of the American people. So even if a higher court later overturned the Detroit federal court's decision, Congress could still determine that the president had committed a political crime against the Constitution in authorizing warrantless domestic spying, and could impeach him.

What Bush and his administration have done in both of these cases falls clearly into that category. By claiming to be above the law and even above the Constitution, the president has in both the NSA spying case and in the Geneva Conventions case, claimed the power of an absolute despot. He has asserted that in time of war--including a so-called "war" on terror which clearly has nothing to do with an actual war--he operates without any checks and balances or any oversight.

He has twisted the role of commander in chief, which the Founders included in the powers of the presidency solely to insure that there would be a civilian responsible to the citizenry above any general, into the role of a generalissimo--a military ruler in charge of the entire nation.

The lock-step Republicans and spineless Democrats in Congress have not challenged this coup by lexicographical manipulation, but the judicial branch has thrown down the gantlet.

Now it is time for the People of the United States to follow up this action.

In November, all the members of the House of Representatives are up for election, along with one-third of the Senate.

For the sake of the future of Constitutional government and for the freedoms enshrined in the Constitution, it is essential that the American people wake up and replace in November all those members of Congress who have allowed this presidential dictatorship to develop unchecked.

The courts have spoken: this president is a criminal on multiple counts. Now the process moves to our elected representatives in Washington. No member of Congress who is unwilling to hold Bush and his accomplices to account and initiate impeachment proceedings against him for his crimes and violations of the Constitution should be returned to office in November.

Some critics have argued that impeachment is an unnecessary diversion from the task of government, since Bush will be gone in 2008 anyway. These people miss the point that leaving this president's crimes and constitutional affronts unchallenged and unpunished would enshrine his transgressions in the mantle of precedent, allowing the next president and her or his successors to pick up wherever Bush leaves off.

To do that would be to sign the death warrant for American democracy.

Authors Website: thiscantbehappening.net



To: American Spirit who wrote (77128)8/22/2006 4:16:44 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362295
 
Message 22742814



To: American Spirit who wrote (77128)8/24/2006 4:37:11 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362295
 
JUDGMENT DAY COMING -- FOR THE NEOCONS

news.yahoo.com

Fri Aug 18, 6:49 AM ET

The Democrats are determined to make the election of 2006 a referendum on Bush and the war in Iraq. And, as of now, that is how history will likely record it.

But beneath the surface of the national election, a different plebiscite is being held, within the conservative movement, on the ideology George Bush imposed on Ronald Reagan's party.

What are the elements of Bushite neoconservatism?

First, an interventionist foreign policy, using U.S. power to impose democracy and "end tyranny on this earth." Afghanistan, Iraq and Lebanon are the laboratories and proving ground.

Second, "Big Government Conservatism," as seen in the deficits, the dearth of vetoes, soaring social spending in wartime, the bulking up of the Department of Education and "faith-based initiatives" -- LBJ-style cash grants to pastors and parsons for Social Gospel work, to reap a harvest of gratitude from the pulpits in elections to come.

Third, a La Raza immigration policy, featuring amnesty and a "path to citizenship" for 12 million illegal aliens, pardons for all businesses that hired illegals, and outsourcing of immigration policy to Corporate America to go abroad and hire workers for jobs here Americans cannot take at the wages offered.

Fourth, a trade policy rooted in the belief that it does not matter where goods are produced or whether Americans produce them. What matters is unimpeded global commerce, where the consumer is king and gets all the goods he wants at the cheapest possible price.

On these four mega-questions, Republicans are as divided as they were in the days of Rockefeller and Goldwater. Where the Right unites -- on tax cuts, John Roberts and Sam Alito -- the president has the nation behind him.

Wherever "conservatives" stand -- whether Old Right or neocon, supply-sider or deficit hawk, America First or global democrat, Big Government or small government -- the returns of Bush's policies are largely in and the outcome unlikely to change. And this is why Bush and the GOP are in trouble, and neoconservatism is in the dock.

The altarpiece of the Bush foreign policy is Iraq. American dead are at 2,600, the wounded at 18,000. Three hundred billion dollars has been plunged into the war. Yet, Iraq is a bloodier, more dangerous place than it has been since the fall of Baghdad. One hundred are being killed every day, half of them in the capital. IED attacks on U.S. troops are at record levels -- three-and-a-half years after Baghdad fell.

The Bush democracy campaign brought stunning electoral gains for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Hamas in Palestine, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Moqtada al-Sadr in Iraq. Our ally Hamid Kharzai is today little more than mayor of Kabul, as the Taliban roam the southeast and coalition casualties reach the highest levels since liberation, five years ago.

North Korea and Iran remain defiant on their nuclear programs. Vladimir Putin is befriending every regime at odds with Bush, from Tehran to Damascus to Caracas. Neocon meddling in The Bear's backyard has gotten us bit.

Unless we grade foreign policy on the nobility of the intent, which is how the liberals used to defend disasters like Yalta, it is not credible to call Bush's foreign policy a success. The Lebanon debacle, once U.S. complicity is exposed, is unlikely to win anyone a Nobel.

Bush's trade policy has left us with annual deficits of $800 billion with the world and $200 billion with Beijing. Once the greatest creditor nation in history, we are now the greatest debtor. U.S. manufacturing has been hollowed out with thousands of plants closed and 3 million industrial jobs vanishing since Bush took office.

As for Bush immigration policy, the nation is in virtual rebellion. Six million aliens have been caught at the Mexican border since he took office. One in 12 had a criminal record. In April-May, millions of Hispanics marched through U.S. cities demanding amnesty and all rights of citizenship for aliens who are breaking the law by even being here. Bush and the Senate are in paralysis, appeasing the lawbreakers by offering amnesties and by opposing House demands that the president seal the border before the invasion brings an end to the America we once knew.

While the economy has been running well since 2003, creating jobs, and the markets are performing well, the real wages of working Americans have not kept pace with the portfolios of the clients of Lawrence Kudlow. Industrial states, like Ohio, could be killing fields of the GOP in November.

To the neocon guru Irving Kristol, "The historical task and political purpose of neoconservatism would seem to be ... to convert the Republican Party and American conservatism in general, against their respective wills, into a new kind of conservative politics suitable to governing a modern democracy."

With some of us, the tutoring never took, but the neocons surely did convert George W. How's your boy doing, Irving?