Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (300768)	8/20/2006 4:26:42 AM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1580216

re: Umm, you do realize that if the rubble pieces are below the resolution of the camera you do realize that buildings are not disassembled in an individual bricks. And speaking of resolution you do realize that the yellow line on the street is clearly visible. re: It the lighting is far enough off-axis, then there might be shadows that indicate there is rubble you do realize that you can estimate the direction of the light from the clearly seen shadows of the buildings :-)) re: But the apparent lack of rubble isn't proof. why not? Either way how would you explain clearly lower resolution of rubble and fairly high resolution of standing buildings :-))