SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: geode00 who wrote (199581)8/27/2006 1:19:25 AM
From: Ichy Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Now, with the bad blood spread by Neocons throughout the world, it's no longer unthinkable that Israel may not be a permanent fixture in the ME. If the Neocons could cause Iraq to be torn into pieces and could consider nuking Iran in a preemptive strike, what else could be considered in the world? What other 'unthinkable' now becomes 'possible?'

It said on CNN tonight that your friend osama considered targeting places like 3 mile Island for his attack. At least you have the assurance that after he turns parts of the US into twinkly radioactive deserts, Israel will turn him into a ball of radioactive dust.



To: geode00 who wrote (199581)8/27/2006 9:26:39 AM
From: bentway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
I think relocating Israel would be a huge job, but the place has been a source of instability and death for fifty years now, ever since Harry Truman was conned into supporting it's creation.

It would be WORTH it, for the sake of world peace. I like the Falklands for their new home. Another person suggested Spitzbergen. An island, where the Israelis had no neighbors would be ideal.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News