SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Fair and Balanced-'Duties Of a Democracy' -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ksuave who wrote (196)8/27/2006 11:40:43 AM
From: atm_prophet  Respond to of 1262
 
ksuave,

You made some decent points up until this post. What a Victim Role of BS ..... The Democratic Party has no such genius
and the wealthiest 1% argument. Get Real man ...

Clinton backed into the technology boom capital gains monumental run in the stock market that flooded government coffers. Had nothing to do with his great economic strategy.

And, don't believe for a second that Karl Rove is a unique genius ... Democrats have equally intelligent strategist.
They just got National Security Wrong in the second election (Which at that time Bush was perceived as stronger and fears of 911 still were more present) and people were fed up with the Folly of Clinton and the embarrassment his behaviour brought on the country in the first election



To: ksuave who wrote (196)8/27/2006 6:11:18 PM
From: American Spirit  Respond to of 1262
 
Rove is also an expert at election fraud. Gary claims Bush won in 2004 "outright" but if you read the new evidence, including Robert Kennedy's articles and the book "Was The 2004 Election Stolen?" it's pretty hard to argue that Bushies didn't steal it a second time in a row. In fact, Bushies may have stolen as many as 350,000 Kerry votes in Ohio alone.

Now you can see the Ohio polls showing democrats way ahead in the governor's race, like a 20% lead. That's what Ohio really thinks of rightwing Republicans. And they know Rove used their state to steal it, which they don't appreciate. Ohio is therefore going blue for the forseable future.



To: ksuave who wrote (196)8/27/2006 6:28:31 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1262
 
aside from enriching the wealthiest 1% of the population at the expense of everyone else.

When ever I see this, I can't believe a thinking adult can say this. I envision some 18 year old freshman after a week of propaganda from some liberal professor.



To: ksuave who wrote (196)8/30/2006 6:13:20 PM
From: GARY P GROBBEL  Respond to of 1262
 
ks...this 1% argument is a canard and has been bandied about by libs who have not looked into the real facts behind the numbers....