Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Oil Sands and Related Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: was Michelangelo7 who wrote (12077)	8/27/2006 10:45:11 AM
From: Bread Upon The Water	Respond to of 25575

Absolutely, right. It is a balancing act. Could an alternate and safer way of playing this resource exist by buying ECA? (Disclosure: I own ECA.) You will have to deploy more capital for sure, and your results will be more moderate, but you'll also get a safety net---plus another exposure to the sands in addition to the resource in the Colubia River basin inasmuch as ECA is looking for a partner to develop its other sands properties. Is someone on the thread astute enough to calculate the impact on ECA's share price if the projected Washington State resource is found? (ECA does have an a majority interest here right)? Just a thought. Bill