Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (8611)	8/27/2006 10:18:08 PM
From: Square_Dealings	Respond to of 219523

A Nuremberg chief prosecutor says there is a case for trying Bush for the 'supreme crime against humanity, an illegal war of aggression against a sovereign nation.' alternet.org

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (8611)	8/27/2006 10:34:10 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219523

<<This is just an idea ... want to sleep on it ... I'm a wacko extremist with crazy ideas>> I think it's best that you not only sleep on it, but try slipping into a coma on same. For, in your schema, who is watching the watcher? Surely not Mr and Mrs Walmart shoppers. I think I would leave it to the French, much civilized, more fun-loving, and certainly better cooks. news.yahoo.com

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (8611)	8/28/2006 12:56:05 AM
From: RJA_	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219523

>>The USA has excellent launch facilities. Perhaps they could announce a new nuclear test programme. Explode a little one 100km above Tehran, at night, for full visual effect, then each month do one a bit lower and a bit bigger until Iran agrees to adopt the new constitution and have NUN inspectors check around to make sure they aren't up to no good. The problem with this otherwise sensible approach, is that there are folks down wind, also nuclear armed. They may not like the fallout, and could retaliate if pissed off enough using the same methods against a US city, or simply massively dump currency surplus. There is a problem with this kind of poker. Someone crazy enough can overturn the table... Contra argument: The folks in Tehran are irrational religious whack jobs who want to speed up the return of the prophet by doing something really nasty. Why give them ability to do same? Fair contra contra argument: Bush is also irrational religious whack job who believes supreme being made him pres for a reason. Does this all sound like a grade B movie?