Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Math Junkie who wrote (24624)	8/29/2006 11:43:53 PM
From: Honey_Bee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

BOB BRINKER did say that RYOCX and QQQQ were interchangeable, but he didn't say it in March or April of 2003 (at least I can't find it). How ironic that QQQQ has actually done a little better than RYOCX. Poor BOB BRINKER--those pesky Q's turn him every which way but loose... LOL!

To: Math Junkie who wrote (24624)	8/30/2006 12:02:39 AM
From: yaetmo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

Math, I hate to do a dija/Will process on you, but your skipping around the point leaves me without much choice. Your 2 stepping avoidance dance pretty well confirms to me that you know full well that Bob did not say one word in April '06 about the his faithful's holdings in the QQQQ position that he recommended they opened 5+ years earlier. Your inferring to intermix a 2000 QQQQ position with a similar, yet different, RYOCX 2003 position and call then call them exactly the same in 2006, is the stuff Will and Honey will haunt you with for a long long time, just like they have done for Bob.