Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (44)	9/5/2006 6:33:42 PM
From: Jim S	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10087

OK, Mike, we obviously agree! If SS were to be privatized, it would only be with many restrictions to protect more vulnerable people. If the option were to simply put everyone's SS money into regular brokerage accounts and tell them "have at it!" I'd agree with you. I'd think that if someone wanted to put a small portion of his money into a gold fund (or any other high beta investment), it would be ok too, again assuming some sort of controls for the inexperienced. As a person who bought both Lucent and WorldCom, I understand exactly what you're saying! <GGG> One problem I do see as critical to the issue is the amount of public vs private money in a so-called 'privatized SS system.' The current SSA spends a BUNCH of money on non-retirement expenses, such as SSI and payments to orphaned kids. Somehow, in a new system, those costs would have to be funded. And, I suppose there'd also have to be some sort of provision for those who somehow, despite all the protections, were able to parlay a reasonable retirement suppliment into an amount too small to live on. I agree there could be some problems, but i don't think the problems would be insurmountable.