Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pompsander who wrote (748795)	9/8/2006 3:23:29 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 769670

"Reason #45" might need to be reconsidered, then. (Well... perhaps that can wait until after the election. No need to rush into things hastily. :-)

To: pompsander who wrote (748795)	9/8/2006 4:08:22 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

Abu Nidal ring a bell? Abu Abbas? $25,000.00 bonuses to the families of homicide bombers? The facts are that SH harbored and promoted terorism.... J.

To: pompsander who wrote (748795)	9/8/2006 10:50:43 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

I have already posted proof otherwise. and you are posting pigcrap too...UN sanction violations is the reason we invaded....BUT...there were many good reasons.

To: pompsander who wrote (748795)	9/9/2006 8:35:38 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

There are 19 good reasons we went into Iraq... (I can't believe we're still going over the same re-hash again and again 3 years later)... all the 19 conditions of the 1991 UN Peace Accord were violated and the UN didn't have the balls to enforce its own accord, so we did... end of story, what more is there to re-hash about this 3 years later? TIA If the United States doesn't do it, then no one will, everyone is a GUTLESS COWARD and waits for us to defend them... don't you know this by now? GZ