SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Not a Short who wrote (210791)9/13/2006 10:24:43 AM
From: BiomavenRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
(OT)

Would water pipes work as well? Also no electrical interference, but I don't know if the water inside poses a problem. It may act kind of like an inside-out co-ax, which I'm guessing isn't ideal for these frequencies.

But attaching electrical equipment to your water pipe is more comforting than to your gas pipe...

Pete



To: Not a Short who wrote (210791)9/13/2006 11:45:15 AM
From: _JulesRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
To: _Jules who wrote (210778) 9/13/2006 10:15:12 AM
From: Not a Short Read Replies (1) of 210815

Fiber isn't the issue. This is about sending the signal through the gas pipeline itself. It isn't meant to be used for overall network traffic, just for the part from the nearest junction to a house. The so called "last mile".

Understood.
Someone a while back claimed to be able to do the same basic thing over electrical lines/service drops, etc.

Jules