Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (203226)	9/17/2006 1:16:49 AM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The video and photographic evidence as well as eywitnesses all trend toward maybe 5% of the concrete was larger chunks. The dust was inches deep throughout a widespread area. Massive clouds of dust made it out over the river as well. Find me ONE...just ONE photograph of large chunks of concrete. If you like, I'll show you dozens of panoramic videos and photos showing no chunks or slabs. I was being extremely generous with 20%. And even 5% is generous. The towers did not contain nearly enough potential energy to do that even if 1/2 the concrete remained whole. Structural engineers worked with the physicists. Go to st911.org Over 200 academicians, engineers, aviation specialists, military specialists, etc...have been doing the work the bush/cheney cover-up specialists did not. Do you not realize the real work is being done by fully qualified people...worldwide? The truth is coming... Now...the seismic evidence. Or can't you handle the proof?

To: Bilow who wrote (203226)	9/17/2006 1:41:57 AM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

After you tackle that short list of 9/11 omissions and distortions that are a massive problem for the "official" fable, there's the task of actually showing the "official" fable has any credence. Without, of course, using the "official" fable itself as evidence. We wouldn't want circular arguments now, would we? Find some independent corroboration on a par with the seismic evidence being corroborated by eyewitness reports. Piece of cake for an "official" story conspiracy theorist such as yourself. The crazy stuff you adherents to the "official" fable believe is outrageous. You probably still believe saddam was involved with 9/11 or that zarqawi had one leg or that WMDs were North, East, West and South of Bagdhad and Tikrit...somewhat. Or that bin laden is a fat, right-handed, ring wearing, broad-nosed guy on a "confession" tape. Or that the air around the WTC site was safe to breathe in the weeks afterward. Or that one about the hijackers using "aliases" even though the alleged list of hijackers came from Atta's luggage...as if Atta, being the alleged "lead hijacker" would carry around a list much less one on which some names were actually aliases while all the names were Arab names while NO Arab names were on the flight manifests of ANY of the flights and ALL the names are accounted for as regular passengers. Yep, you crazy conspiracy theorists sure swallow anything that a pack of known liars will feed you.