Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HH who wrote (15906)	9/18/2006 1:23:12 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

And what about WTC #7? No plane hit that building. It collapsed into it's foot print too. 3 steel buildings, all collapsing into their footprints. And this is done with only two air planes. Neat trick. I think the Arabs should go into the controlled demolition business.

To: HH who wrote (15906)	9/18/2006 4:12:58 PM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20039

RE: "But for people to conclude that it had to be a controlled demolition simply because it looked like a demolition is not spending enough energy to figure out how those airplanes could, in fact , cause everything that happened. They just conclude it couldnt have happened because they cant explain it and then jump to some really wild speculation that it must be a govt plot to start a war." Not true. Those who have concluded the WTC was taken down by controlled demolitions have done the research based on the evidence, and that evidence supports no other conclusion. It's not a theory. It's a fact. From the construction of the towers, some basic knowledge on how implosions are set up, and video and seismic evidence, it's possible to recreate the demolition of the towers, and identify exactly where the charges were placed and when they were set off. First, huge charges were set off in the basement to cut out a big chunk of the central core just prior to the visible collapse. That was picked up as 2 point quakes from several seismic locations, and camera crews reported the explosions at ground level. The purpose is to preload the structure by letting the weight of the core stress the building toward the center and down. Next, the cores were cut in the impact areas. In the first collapse, the top 30 floors were demolished from the bottom up, traditional demolition style. When that sequence was complete, the next sequence was innitiated by cutting the core approximately 15 floors ahead of the collapse progression. In the second collapse, the collapse progression was continious all the way down, with the core being cut approximately 15 floors ahead of the collapse. This can be observed in video, and is also shown in the two second difference between the first collapse and the second, where the acceleration of gravity was stopped and started in the first collapse vs. being continious in the second. The key in bringing down the buildings, and the smoking gun proof of implosions is the central core. Contrary to NIST and FEMA reports, and popular misconceptions, those buildings were NOT hollow shells. Here's a construction photo to show you what I'm talking about: letsroll911.net Nearly half of the interior floor space in the buildings was taken up by that massive central core. The observed "unzipping" effect of the perimeter columns, which is the basis of the pancake theory, is flat out impossible without first demolishing the core. There is not a single engineering theory supporting the official story that accounts for the core failure. The existence of the central core is simply left out of the analysis. At best, the melted steel/softened steel theories could only account for the failure of the buildings where fire was present. If those theories were accurate, what you would have seen is the buildings slowly settling down to the unmelted/unsoftened core structure. That core had one purpose, and one purpose only; to resist the force of gravity, with huge engineered safety margins. That the buildings failed at the observed near free fall speed of 32 feet per second per second, could ONLY happen by demolishing the core. Aside from the physical evidence, there is a ton of circumstantial evidence to support controlled demolitions, starting with the fact all the evidence was destroyed illegally. Federal law prohibits the destruction of evidence in commercial building failures, yet the WTC steel was hauled off and destroyed ASAP, under carefully controlled conditions to make sure none of it became unaccounted for. The body of evidence proving foreknowledge of the attacks is massive, along with a huge body of evidence of diversions to prevent the prevention of the attacks. The insiders responsible for carrying out the attacks are on record as being in favor of a 9/11 type of event, and Bush's first order of business was to appoint those insiders to every possition necessary to oversee and implement the attack. The invasion of Afghanistan has put a global heroin monopoly, worth $3 trillion per year, in the hands of the invaders. The invasion of Iraq was worth over a half trillion a year in windfall oil profits. You're looking at another trillion dollars to date for no bid contract war profiteers. And that still doesn't count the political power usurped as a result of the attacks by those responsible. RE: "its disheartening to realize that there are people out there (and here) who are that screwed up in the mind and are this anti-Govt. (Bush)" What's disheartening is there are actually people fool enough to continue believing the official story in spite of the mountain of evidence proving the official story is bogus front, backward and sideways.