SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marcos who wrote (21344)9/18/2006 1:56:40 PM
From: LoneClone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78405
 
Thanks so much for this, marcos, excellent distraction from the rather boring paid work I am supposed to be dong right now.

I find fascinating the way that social contradictions and tensions work themselves out in popular culture. (I use the word "contradiction" in the dialectical sense, as the inherently unstable expression of competing social forces and ideologies aka versions of the truth. These contradictions inevitably become the subject matter of jokes and other expressions of popular culture.)

Just before I left academia I was becoming interested in Mexican and Brazilian cultural studies.

Cultural studies developed originally in the 1960s and 1970s as a reaction to the inability of either traditional Marxist cultural analysis or mainstream sociology to come to terms with the insights of post-structuralism, post-modernism, semiotics and other attempts to grapple with the mutable and constructed nature of meanings in a media-saturated globalized world.

By the end of the last millennium, cultural studies was becoming institutionalised in academia and hence less interesting and critical -- I'm using "critical" in the social scientific sense as meaning questioning of assumptions -- so I turned my attention to the cultural studies of the borderlands, looking at the nature of social and symbolic action at physical, metaphorical, and cultural frontiers, and no surprise, the best work was coming out of the hybrid cultures Mexico and Brazil.

A good argument can be made that in many ways Mexico and Brazil were the first post-modern societies, fervently mixing cultures, ethnicities, and societies even before the advent of modern technology and communication.

Unfortunately for both countries, due to the contexts of power in which the hybridization was occurring, it led to rigidly hierarchical societies. IMO the extent to which these hierarchies can be dismantled without destabilizing the entire society will be the measure of both Mexico's and Brazil's future.

P.S. How to piss off United Statians -- point out that Brazil was the first "United States" in the New World, but rather than solipsistically adding "of America", they appended just "of Brasil".

LC



To: marcos who wrote (21344)9/18/2006 9:22:15 PM
From: que seria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78405
 
A welcome perspective as usual, marcos. But inhibition from lack of Spanish (Castilian) blood! There's a twist! Can't square with my time in Spain, but that was long ago. Jets of colored water to greet protest, a carbine on every corner, and an omnipresent mother church to go with a papa Franco. Yet Spanish cinema shows inhibitions have since been shredded with gusto.

...and just to be on topic: MMGG isn't testing my prior statement about buying as low as it wants to go. It just has me pondering whether "as low" means that gap down to 1.20 is going to be filled in an October Surprise. I had thought it was not, but even a plunge to .80 would take us back only to December. I'm in no hurry and will wait for tax loss season.