Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (79521)	9/19/2006 6:41:32 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

3 - Iran is bigger and while we could defeat its military without too much difficulty if we had enough time and good bases to project power from, it would be harder to control any insurgency. Iraq was different however. Not only would there be no insurgency, the people would welcome us with flowers... Right? You neocon warmongers are good only at starting wars. Not in executing them or ending them. However, since most of the neocon warmongers' experience with war is only via playing video games or watching movies, that is understandable. 4 - If you where going to invade Iran it would be easier to do so from Iraq. I see. So when would that invasion begin? Are you neocon warmongers sending your kids, or sending your own asses this time? Cuz we are pretty much out of soldiers, y' know!