Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : PLNI - Plasticon International, Inc. (Bulls Board) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (6908)	9/20/2006 10:35:36 AM
From: gopackersgo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8122

you mean the brain trust on the 'other' board can't answer this Jeffrey? I mean really those are the self proclaimed Peter Drucker's of the investment world.

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (6908)	9/20/2006 8:18:06 PM
From: iwannaride0	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8122

PLEASE DOCUMENT THESE OBSERVATIONS USING FACTS. Do any saviors have in their possession or have in anyway (verbal or otherwise) proof that this is occurring or received information that it will occur? Have the saviors received stock or compensation in anyway from PLNI or any of its officers? Have the saviors received compensation or stock from any concerned party owning (including naked shares) a position in PLNI? Interesting predicament... we have on one hand a gaggle of "concerned by-standers" claiming no position in a stock trying to "save us" from ourselves "saviors". They do this while actively pummeling the same stock in and on every investment board possible under various aliases in an effort to reduce the pps. This is all happening while actual investors that hold positions in a stock wish for it to succeed. Arguing with extensive DD against and fact against propaganda, innuendo and personal attacks constantly regurgitated from the "saviors". So these self proclaimed "stock police" try and position themselves as the "saviors"? IMHO, not in this case. No... once they begin to post derogatory and defamatory remarks against the president of a company, the company itself and many well known longs they make themselves enemies of a stock versus neutral concerned citizens. Maybe from their liberal ivory tower it looks like they are "saviors", but from an investors perspective disrespectful comments are libelous and defamatory towards PLNI. Are these "saviors" doing this to make money? Do they have a personal grudge against one or more investors? Do they want to see PLNI go out of business to avoid covering? Has Turek in some way crossed their pathetic paths? I don't know... I sense that we will all know more very soon what PLNI is about. Until then the "saviors" remain bashers in my book.