Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (12453)	9/26/2006 6:47:27 PM
From: Jim S	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71588

I very much doubt that polygamy is necessarily as "twisted" as you allege. It is only societies that have become pretty advanced that frown on it. Not to say it is never "twisted," only that in most of human history, it was an accepted way of life. What exactly would you have the LDS church do to the polygamous offshoots? Kill them all? They're excummunicated, which is about all I can see is within the power of the church. Further, I object to your "you'd care if you were female" comment. Millions, maybe billions, of women may or may not "care." Not because of their gender, but because of their cultural upbringing. Feminism isn't necessarily an altruistic goal for the entire world.