SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Richnorth who wrote (1938)9/28/2006 7:27:04 AM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10087
 
Police did not try to stop the protesters from pouring about 1,540 pounds of mud on the sidewalk outside the ministry. Some of the demonstrators carried a banner saying "Stop your mud Mr. Bakrie or your mud will stop you!"

JAKARTA, Indonesia (Sept. 28) - Indonesia will resettle more than 3,000 families whose houses have been swamped by mud surging from a gas exploration site and will dump the sludge into the sea to avoid more destruction, a minister said Wednesday.

The mud appeared after an accident occurred deep in a drilling shaft on the seismically charged island of Java. It now covers more than 988 acres and is currently being contained by an ever-expanding network of dams that are breached almost daily.

Public Works Minister Djoko Kirmanto said efforts to cap the so-called mud volcano would continue until scientists concluded there was no chance of stopping the sludge, which has been streaming from the ground for nearly four months, currently at a rate of 126,000 cubic meters daily for nearly four months.

In the meantime, the mud will be dumped in the sea and more than 3,000 families would be resettled on the orders of the president because the land "was no longer fit for human habitation," he said.

The environment minister, who had earlier threatened to block efforts to dispose of the mud in the sea on grounds it might be harm the environment, said the mud was not toxic and that he now supported the plan.

Police have said they intend to file criminal charges against nine employees from gas exploration company Lapindo Brantas over the disaster, alleging its drilling activities triggered the mud and that it failed to respond to the torrent in the correct way.

The company says seismic activity might have caused the mud to break the surface.

Kirmanto said a railway line and toll road frequently swamped by the mud would be rerouted and the network of dams would be strengthened to avoid erosion during the upcoming rainy season.

Basuki Hadi Muljono, the head of a government team tasked with handling the disaster, said resettling the families and disposing of the mud would cost at least $162 million.

The costs would be born by Lapindo, not the government, he said.

Experts say the mud volcano is one of the largest ever recorded on land. The mud is believed to come from a reservoir more than 3 1/2 miles below the ground that has been pressurized by tectonic activity or by the accumulation of hydrocarbon gases.

The company is trying to stem the flow by pumping in concrete, but geologists fear it is unstoppable. They say the mud could stop on its own anytime -- or keep flowing for years to come.

Earlier Wednesday, protesters dumped a truckload of mud from the torrent outside the offices of Welfare Ministry Aburizal Bakrie to demand he do more to help the some 10,000 people displaced. Bakrie's family owns a controlling stake in Lapindo.

"This is out of control and not enough is being done to stop it," said Emmy Hafild, executive director of Greenpeace Southeast Asia, the environmental group that held the protest. "Bakrie should not run away from his responsibilities."

Police did not try to stop the protesters from pouring about 1,540 pounds of mud on the sidewalk outside the ministry. Some of the demonstrators carried a banner saying "Stop your mud Mr. Bakrie or your mud will stop you!"

Bakrie, who is one of Indonesia's wealthiest businessmen, has been quoted as saying the mud flow was not his responsibility.



To: Richnorth who wrote (1938)9/28/2006 8:50:32 AM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10087
 
The main theme of the Mearsheimer and Walt piece is that the Israeli influence in the US is so overriding that support of Israel is the mainstay of our Middle East policy.

The premise of the article is so hugely flawed as to not merit serious discussion or consideration by anyone who is not completely and thoroughly emotionally engaged in the matter. The piece completely ignores the fact that protecting the US supply of ME oil far outweighs any influence the Israel lobby may have in the US. We have gone to war twice in a decade in the ME to protect oil, but not once have we sent our troops in Israel's defense.

Oil company influence far outstrips the influence of Israel as respects our ME policy. Even Chomsky correctly notes that Israel serves our oil-related interests by putting a damper on Arab nationalism and by diverting to some extent Islamist attention from the US and its Saudi partners to it. It is clearly and inescapably the protection of our oil supply, not support for Israel, which is the mainstay of our ME policy.

Mearsheimer and Walt's scholarship has also been assailed as inadequate. But I find the failure to recognize the obvious and true mainstay of our ME policy, a failure so profound and obvious, to be an indication that perhaps other considerations [antisemitism in academic garb being the most prominent] are at play.