Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (12607)	10/2/2006 1:10:01 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 71588

"What are you suggesting about the 90 senators? If you think they convinced me, that's not true at all." I am suggesting that they had the best available intelligence at the time. History tells us that it was weak from lack of human intelligence. Everyone knew that at the time. The fact that you are anti republican comes as no surprise to me. The words you have written have for years indicated that you wish to be thought of as a partisan's partisan. You have shown in the past that when you read words not written by a leftwing extremist you "read" them looking for a way to refute them or use them to promote leftwing extremism without ever considering their wisdom. "It turns out that some of the intelligence was not fully correct." Do you mean the intel that said there were WMDs when there were none? Dude, don't forget to inhale some air between hits on your pipe. We know there were WMDs and more importantly that there were active WMD programs. That has been proven. "It is the party of inclusion. Democrats drum out anyone that does not toe the line on major policy issues. Even people who espouse democrat policies like Chaffee and McCain are allowed in the party. Democrats tried to evict "the conscience of the senate" Joe Liebermann for being honorable." Maybe so but weren't there GOP started rumors about McCain when he ran against Bush in the primary....in SC, that he was gay or had an extramarital affair? And isn't it true, that the party decided to support Chafee in RI only because they didn't think the conversative who ran against him in the primary could win in an open state wide election because he was too right? Read what I wrote (in the paragraph above) again. Asked and answered. Dirty politics seems inevitable. What about Kerry's lies about the honorable Swift Bat Veterans? There are still some head in the sand leftwing partisans that pretend they don't believe the truth risked their livelihoods to reveal when the media was asleep at the switch.