Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: plantlife who wrote (212133)	10/1/2006 1:30:50 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

plantlife That was based on his insinuation that I should interpret his training lessons at Intel preclude any violations of the law by him or any of the other 100,000 Intel workers, based merely on these lessons!!! Consider the alternative. If Intel had no training plan whatsoever just what restrictions or limitations could you expect the sales force to respect? There has to be a company policy and training is the way you convey what that policy is. Do you really think Intel, or any other company, would turn a sales force loose with no idea what was permissible? Your view, and that of some of the others, must require additional training on how to break the law. Otherwise there would be no way for the sales force to carry out the diabolical policy you seem so convinced exists. This is getting ludicrous. You guys are so worked up in a froth that you're losing touch with reality. It will all come out in the wash.

To: plantlife who wrote (212133)	10/1/2006 3:50:44 PM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

>> You and your pals are the ones who are harping on it. Get over it, there are better topics. I see you have 25/day posts now. So we have plenty of opportunity to exasperate our fellow thread participants. Regarding the famous law suit. That is really not an Intel fans' topic. It is usually AMD fans who always bring it out either as one of the fundamental supports of AMD viability, or icing on the cake to AMD market cap. I and other Intel investors just consider it a stupidity that will wither and go away. By the way, you referred to Intel criminality in Japan. Just what has come of that law suit ? I know something called a consent decree happened. That governs future activity. Did AMD win anything related to past actions ?