Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (305116)	10/3/2006 8:40:39 AM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1577098

so you are only around 20, it shows. No wonder you don't know any history

To: SilentZ who wrote (305116)	10/3/2006 11:56:18 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1577098

Z, > The page probably saved the conversation -- it's very easy to do. ... And sexual banter with a member of Congress certainly would qualify as "interesting." Which makes me all the more suspicious about the page himself. At best, Foley was already flirting with a page, and the page being uncomfortable with the advances just wanted to capture some proof. At worst, Foley was set-up. Although the responsibility falls squarely on Foley's shoulders, I'm not going to accept any of this sanctimony coming from the Democrats who are asking, "Were the Republicans guilty of covering up a pedophile?" Because IMO, the Democrats knew about the existence of these IM logs a long time ago. Just like Republicans probably knew about Foley's pedophilia for a while now, the Democrats probably knew about it as well. If they were truly concerned about protecting children from pedophiles, they would have come forth with the IM logs ASAP. Tenchusatsu