Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JGoren who wrote (145414)	10/3/2006 9:13:39 AM
From: limtex	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

JG - so what was the point of making the application? Best, L

To: JGoren who wrote (145414)	10/3/2006 9:15:48 AM
From: Blabaltech	Respond to of 152472

Is there a tactical benefit to submitting such a preliminary request such as presenting arguments and facts to the judge, so that he is more familiar with the issues?

To: JGoren who wrote (145414)	10/3/2006 9:50:56 AM
From: Stan	Respond to of 152472

I love positive spins, but I do not think the judge's comments can be called a neutral event. Clearly, there would have been a "right" to an injunction but the Judge said that Q had not established evidence of that right in this case. I think the comments of the judge have weakened Q's bargaining position in the settlement discussions of next week.