SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (305172)10/3/2006 2:04:58 PM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577900
 
Would that include George Soros, Warren Buffet, and Ted Turner?

Z should have exclude wealthy people with a conscience.

ABC bowed to the demands of the Clintonistas, no?

How?

Al



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (305172)10/3/2006 2:28:01 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577900
 
>Would that include George Soros, Warren Buffet, and Ted Turner?

"Tend to." On average. In 2004, the most reliable indicator of whether someone voted for Bush or Kerry was not religion... it was whether the person made more than $70K.

>ABC bowed to the demands of the Clintonistas, no?

How so?

>Besides, IMO Moore's movie is "fictional 9/11 smut," but hey, it seems the definition of "documentary" these days has been degraded.

Maybe so, but they picked the other 9/11 movie and not that one.

-Z



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (305172)10/3/2006 6:28:02 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577900
 
Z, > The higher up you go, the less that's the case, probably largely because wealthier people tend to vote Republican.

Would that include George Soros, Warren Buffet, and Ted Turner?


The fact that you know all the wealthy democrats by name should tell you something. If someone asked me to list all the wealthy Republicans, I wouldn't know where to begin.