Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (213405)	10/12/2006 12:35:20 AM
From: fastpathguru	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

That was certainly the impression I got from a number of your posts. If that wasn't your intention then you sure gave the wrong impression. There is a vast gulf between excercising a questionable defense and admitting guilt. My posts and those of others that you were arguing against yesterday were criticising Malloy's questionable defense, and not proposing the notion that he was admitting guilt. Maybe you should review yesterday's thread in that light, since you had the wrong impression. You might just see that I was NOT passing judgeement on Intel wrt the antitrust case, but rather merely exposing the weakness of Malloy's statement, with examples. (Rest assured fellow readers, I'm not trying to start this debate up again. The threshold of what I will respond to is set very high.) fpg