Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Magrathea who wrote (213492)	10/12/2006 5:25:44 PM
From: Petz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

There are many charges that don't depend on testimony, such as contracts that forbade advertising or any documention of the conditions for marketing rebates. Petz

To: Magrathea who wrote (213492)	10/12/2006 6:31:41 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Respond to of 275872

Magrathea, That is blindingly obvious. If AMD can't get Ted and his ilk to say Intel pressured/threatened their companies, AMD will loose its case. Apparently not blindingly enough. It's reported as if it was a fact yet we don't have him confirming that statement or the context. AMD accusation != fact. Dovrak repeating a rumor != fact. For arguments sake, however, let's suppose Ted repeats the Guacomole incident in depositions and on the stand. How deep in the guacamole will Intel find itself? I wouldn't presume to know for sure but obviously it wouldn't help.