Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (306280)	10/13/2006 3:31:30 PM
From: J.B.C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572724

OBL was not the proven culprit behind the embassy bobings until 1998, and Al Qaida didn't even exist as an organization until about 1995-1996. CLinton also never found out who carried out the USS Cole attack. The verdict didn't come in until February 2001. siliconinvestor.com The proof OBL was behind the embassy bombings also wasn't clear until 1998. BTW, the CIA did not prove OBL was behind the USS Cole until Feb 2001 siliconinvestor.com Quite interesting that this President sat around months and years after the killing of innocent American citizens, and was satisfied with the lact of results from his intelligence community. What exactly do you guy's demand from your Democraptic leadership? Bush announced that OBL and Al Qeada was behind the 9/11 attacks within days. So with all these "discoveries" that Clinton didn't know anything (which is closer to the truth than you'll ever understand), was Clinton lying to us last month with Chris Wallace that he was obsessed with getting OBL? Or was he lying when he said in the previous linked audio tape where he had nothing on OBL? You revisionist supporters have to work on at least getting a consistant story, but with Clinton "helping" you I'm aware of the challange that imposes. Jim